Archived Entry

Post Date : Nov 5, 2007 at 1030

Category : Ethics | Gender | History | New England Patriots | Other Authors' Books | Politics | War

Do More : You can leave a response from your own site.

A Late Surge

November 5th, 2007 by Ellen

Yeah, I’m probably going to talk about Iraq–but first, the Patriots need some praise.  Neither team was really sharp–and the officiating crew made what seemed like an intentional effort to insert themselves into the outcome–but, in the end, the Patriots did precisely what needed to be done.  Addai nearly won the game all by himself, though–it was a very impressive day on his part.  Bill Belichick may not be the most charming fellow ever (although I confess that I find him strangely–or maybe not so strangely–attractive), but seriously, if we had to go through D-Day again, wouldn’t you want him to be the guy planning it?  And read this, if you want to see why he is legitimately furious about the NFL using selective injustice against him earlier this season.  (Welcome to karma, dude.)

For those of you who dislike sports, you may stop skimming now, if so inclined.  But, if you hate politics, resume skimming at once. 

I don’t like the war in Iraq.  I thought it was stupid when it first came up; I think it’s stupid now.  I did support taking action in Afghanistan–even before September 11th.   After all, this was happening long before that terrible day.  By “action,” I don’t mean war, as such, but I think the international community could have been convinced to try and suppress the Taliban–and this could well have changed history.  Even this country might have agreed to help out, and that would certainly have had an impact on what is happening currently.  In fact, with intelligent leadership, we might have lots of friends we don’t have right now–and may never have again.  But, that is precisely the type of leadership we did not have–not even close–and it certainly hasn’t turned out very well.  There is no way anyone will ever know for sure, but I am quite convinced that if five members of the Supreme Court hadn’t decided to appoint a President of the United States all by themselves in 2000, the world would be entirely different–and some iconic buildings in lower Manhattan would still be standing. 

But, I digress.  Because, alas, we are in Iraq, and there is a dreadful mess to clean up.  On a short-term basis, the surge may be working a little bit, but unless our soldiers stay there indefinitely, that surely won’t be sustained, and that will have a devastating impact on the country for decades to come, I fear.  Both countries, actually.  If we were going to invade, there should have been a coherent plan–and the reality, I think, is that part of that plan would have required reinstating the draft.  Charlie Rangel may be a wacky guy, but I do think that he is right about this.  If there is going to be a major war, there really must be a sense of “shared sacrifice” across the country–or what you will end up with is….a defeat.  I very strongly believe that national service (not necessarily military, of course) should be a requirement for all citizens, and while I shudder at the thought of bringing back the draft, if we had a draft–with no loopholes–I suspect even the most bellicose Administration in history still wouldn’t be able to take the country to war against its will. 

But then again, as we know, this Administration’s idea of shared sacrifice is to say: “I encourage you all to go shopping more.”  Would it be that hard to suggest–for starters–oh, say, conserving energy?  Just a thought.

It is strange, actually, that yapping about the Patriots led me into thinking about Iraq so intensely.  But, really, Belichick’s win-at-all-costs; who-cares-if-it-is-pretty attitude is actually exactly what you need to win a war.  (Ever seen this page?  It’s quite damning.)  Yeah, it’s only football, but there’s a serious mind working there, and if he had taken a different life path and had been the Secretary of Defense back in 2003, it would be hard to convince me that the war–if, in fact, he had recommended such a thing, which it’s entirely possible he would have been far too intelligent to do–would not have turned out differently.

Right now, I am reading this.  But I think I would maybe rather be reading this.

Or possibly these, which I adored as a child.

Posted in Ethics, Gender, History, New England Patriots, Other Authors' Books, Politics, War |

3 Responses

  1. Carina Says:

    My dad is a military guy, and he agrees with you. He thinks we need a draft because that’s the only way to end this thing, the war would be over in three days. Personally, I’m not so sure about that, public opinion doesn’t seem to count for much these days, if they’re determined to push ahead anyway then what, what are a few riots in the streets except a pretext to declare martial law. I don’t think it’s fair to our generation to hold us all hostage to the stupidity of voters (younger voters proved smarter in 2004), if there is a draft I don’t think it should be based on age but on having yard signs or bumper stickers or making public statements of support of certain candidates, clean up your own mess. And as for effectiveness, well, having a huge population of unwilling, untrained, deeply resentful soldiers will result in a lot of fragging incidents as well as a bunch of people never allowed to return to the US. My heart goes out to all of the soldiers who don’t want to go and don’t have any choice, but I’d say that the fact that a cause doesn’t inspire enough or nearly enough volunteers to be successful without a draft, and the fact that according to my dad the desertion rate is as high as Vietnam, is already a statement as powerful as a draft riot, if the deciders want to listen.

  2. Ellen Says:

    It _would_ end casual wars.

    However, I think regular forms of national service should be required of everyone over the age of 18. In all likelihood, military service would mostly involve younger citizens–but, I think everyone should be involved with doing what s/he can to better the country in some form or other.

  3. Dee Says:

    I’m not sure that the Manhattan Skyline would look the same but I’m *positive* that the response to being attacked would not have been idiotic cowboy diplomacy. Iraq happened because they needed a distraction from the fact that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda are still out there.

    This is what happens when you let a spoiled former mediocre frat boy run a country.

    I agree about a national service program. The problem is I wouldn’t want the federal government running it.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.